Re: New Midnight Commander upstream release needs help with translations!
by Slava Zanko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi, all.
I want to say 'big thanks' to Jindrich Novy for help to us :)
I see discussion about translations. Now I have thee ways:
1) Try to use gnome translation project
(http://live.gnome.org/TranslationProject). But in fact, Midnight
Commander now not a part of Gnome and use maillists on gnome.org in
historical reasons (and no more).
2) Use Transifex infrastructure. As I seen in this maillist, this slow
way :)
3) hope that mc will be supported as external project of Fedora.
What way is better to us? :)
P.S. Sorry guys, I don't have any expirience in these questions
therefore some my words may be funny to you. I started the revival of
mc with a slogan 'better to ask forgiveness than permission'. In this
case I ask for forgiveness, but I don't stay in one place :)
WBR, Slavaz.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLCkJPb3oGR6aVLpoRAp/tAKCCUoAqdSI/r7/bM5ChgrofLe+zHwCfaGXx
hIiG9suQkvg2EfvouwZMKKA=
=BSqm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 years, 4 months
[Bug 501875] New: Swedish yum strings incorrect or not translated
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Swedish yum strings incorrect or not translated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501875
Summary: Swedish yum strings incorrect or not translated
Product: Fedora Localization
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: Other language
AssignedTo: dimitris(a)glezos.com
ReportedBy: bd.dali(a)gmail.com
QAContact: aalam(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Some yum strings are either misspelled or not translated, example:
[...]
Transaktionssamanfattning
==================================================================================================================
Installerar 0 Package(s)
Uppdaterar 8 Package(s)
Tar bort 0 Package(s)
[...]
- "Transaktionssamanfattning" is misspelled, should be
"Transaktionssammanfattning".
- "Package(s)" should be translated to "Paket".
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 11 RC.
How reproducible:
Very.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run "yum update" on a swedish FC11 RC. If there are any updates, you'll see.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 4 months
Accessibility Guide
by Eric Christensen
I think I am at a point where the new(er) Accessibility Guide is ready
to be translated. It is more of an article than a guide at only nine
pages.
The git is located at https://fedorahosted.org/accessibility-guide/ and
permissions to the repo should be ready.
What else do you need to know?
Thanks,
Eric
14 years, 4 months
Chinese Release Notes errors
by John J. McDonough
For some time now a number of errors have been preventing building the
Chinese release notes, both simplified and Taiwanese.
Most of these errors involve constructs &PRODVER; or — where the
trailing semicolon has been removed in the translation.
--McD
14 years, 4 months
FedoraStudio: translation error in Release notes
by Orcan Ogetbil
Hi all,
In the release note section of the FedoraStudio feature [1] there was
a sentence that started with
"An optional multimedia-menus package is provided..."
When this was transferred to the translation teams, apparently the
dash "-" between "multimedia" and "menus" got dropped (Why?). This
multimedia-menus is actually the same multimedia-menus you folks have
translated [2]. It is the name of the RPM package that you can pull
with "yum install multimedia-menus". I believe that because the dash
was dropped, the phrase "multimedia menus" got translated into many
languages. This is not we want, because now the feature is there (but
it is optional), and the user will not know what package she needs to
install.
Is there a way to fix this or are we too late?
Sorry for not noticing this before.
Orcan
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio#Release_Notes
[2] https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/multimedia-menus/master/
14 years, 4 months
Re: More details on Issues with Release Notes translations
by Ruediger Landmann
On 11/19/2009 02:03 AM, John J. McDonough wrote:
> Going through all the languages on docs.fp.o I find some interesting
> things.
>
> pt-BR is marked draft and is, in fact, older than the others. It is
> missing the sections that are not translated in the other languages. I
> think the discoonect here is that on the first push to docs.fp.o, I
> pushed all languages that were at greater than 90%. Since then we have
> only pushed 100%. pt-BR is still only at 92%.
Correct -- this (and the Czech HTML version) are incomplete translations
of an earlier version of the doc.
>
> We probably should bring up on the trans list whether we want to wait
> for 100%. The French team in particular objected to pushing partly
> translated documents. I suspect some of the others may want to see
> mostly translated documents published.
We also need to distinguish between parking partial translations
somewhere for translators to proofread (at least until we get Transifex
0.7, which will make it much easier for translators to build the docs
themselves) and publishing them on d.fp.o.
While it's only docs maintainers publishing the docs, I think we can
only hope to agree on a threshold (whether 100%, 95%, or whatever) to
apply to all translations.
Another (and I think, better) alternative is that once it becomes easy
for translators to build the docs themselves, then the leaders (and
possibly other members) of the various teams should get commit access to
d.fp.o. This way, each team can be responsible for publishing their
translation themselves. This way, each team has more control over how
and when their work gets published. It also spreads the work around more
— what we're doing now is not really sustainable or scalable.
>
> In all the other languages, 4.1.6, 5.2.2, 5.6.1, and 5.7.1 are not
> translated
> All are missing the revision history
> Titles for 7.5 and 8.9 are untranslated
> Title for 4.4 is untranslated in all except Chinese and Russian
> Title for 4.1 is untranslated in Dutch
>
> On the copies I ran last night
> (http://fedora.is-sixsigma.com/F12beta/), I only checked Dutch,
> Portuguese, Polish and Spanish. On those, all of the sections
> untranslated on docs.fp.o were translated. In Dutch, Portuguese and
> Polish, the title for 8.9 was translated.
Thanks for the sleuthing, John. I have answers for some of these already
— I'll follow up on the others and post my findings shortly.
Cheers
Rudi
14 years, 4 months
Release Notes updated translations: pl-PL, pt-PT, zh-CN
by Ruediger Landmann
I've just rebuilt and uploaded the Release Notes in Polish, European
Portuguese, and Simplified Chinese to take advantage of the latest
translations.
Thanks guys for all your hard work :)
Cheers
Ruediger
14 years, 4 months
Introduction
by tomasz
Tomasz
Tomasz Szczeszak
Gliwice, Poland
geek85, Polish
student, Computer science, Opole Universisty of Technology
GPGID: 27B6C641
14 years, 4 months
Re: Release Notes updated translations: pl-PL, pt-PT, zh-CN
by Tian Shixiong
> I've just rebuilt and uploaded the Release Notes in Polish, European
> Portuguese, and Simplified Chinese to take advantage of the latest
> translations.
>
> Thanks guys for all your hard work :)
>
> Cheers
>
> Ruediger
>
Thanks for your hard work, Ruediger!
Cheers
Tiansworld
14 years, 4 months
Re: Chinese Release Notes errors
by Tian Shixiong
> For some time now a number of errors have been preventing building the
> Chinese release notes, both simplified and Taiwanese.
>
> Most of these errors involve constructs &PRODVER; or — where the
> trailing semicolon has been removed in the translation.
>
> --McD
>
Thanks , McD!
I've corrected these errors.
14 years, 4 months