Hi,
I suggest also to keep only the word of coordinator, and the sponsor
is gonna be important in the future - if we gonna have a proper
leadership group who is coordinating the language team leaders, giving
out permissions, and keeping the drill running,makes news, and new
available resources. You mentioned the "helping the best end-user
language experience" role but this is already exists - called in
Zanata as Reviewer, or more precisely were called in Transifex earlier
as proofreader, what is can be set by the coordinator.
Zoltan
2016-08-12 8:21 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Holcroft <jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr>:
Dear translator teams,
I have a tiny word issue with roles in localization, we currently have a
mix-up of words. After the little email discussion with Noriko and
conversations at Flock, I feel like a general consensus already exists, but
I prefer to write it here.
TL;DR; For a L10N Team, we currently have different roles about the person
who manage it : sponsor, maintainer, lead and coordinator. I request the
right to use "coordinator" as language on all wiki pages.
Please react here if you strongly disagree. If there is disagreement, feel
free the react for or against the proposal.
End : 31/08/2016
Some definition :
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sponsor
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/coordinator
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/maintain
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/leader
When reading the definitions, the coordinator is the most logical word to
use to me.
Here is my understanding of his roles :
* helping access management (groups approval and introduction)
* explain Fedora process and send relevant information to the language team
* being a privileged contact for newcomers
* answer questions and help community to have a continual improvement
process (includes reaching consensus and help problem solving)
By the way, to make a full explanation, here is the role I see for a
language team : helping to have the best end-user "language" experience.
Please note this is not Fedora software focused but Fedora product focused,
it means we sometimes/often improve upstream project. The translation
priority is defined per team, but a global priority lists already exists for
fedora packages.
thanks for your time,
--
Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
--
trans mailing list
trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/trans@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
PGP: 06853DF7