Dear translator teams,
I have a tiny word issue with roles in localization, we currently have a mix-up of words. After the little email discussion with Noriko and conversations at Flock, I feel like a general consensus already exists, but I prefer to write it here.
TL;DR; For a L10N Team, we currently have different roles about the person who manage it : sponsor, maintainer, lead and coordinator. I request the right to use "coordinator" as language on all wiki pages.
Please react here if you strongly disagree. If there is disagreement, feel free the react for or against the proposal.
End : 31/08/2016
Some definition : http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sponsor http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/coordinator http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/maintain http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/leader
When reading the definitions, the coordinator is the most logical word to use to me.
Here is my understanding of his roles : * helping access management (groups approval and introduction) * explain Fedora process and send relevant information to the language team * being a privileged contact for newcomers * answer questions and help community to have a continual improvement process (includes reaching consensus and help problem solving)
By the way, to make a full explanation, here is the role I see for a language team : helping to have the best end-user "language" experience. Please note this is not Fedora software focused but Fedora product focused, it means we sometimes/often improve upstream project. The translation priority is defined per team, but a global priority lists already exists for fedora packages.
thanks for your time,