On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Kévin Raymond
<shaiton(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
We get some requests about creating new teams, changing
coordinators,
dealing with maintainers, transifex…
The ones really able to take actions are the FLSCo members[0], right?
FLSCo is pretty much inactive for years now. I know some of the folks
who were active back then lurk in the lists and respond to personal
emails.
Kevin, I'm all in to have you participate more in FLP, seeing your
work for Docs+L10n.
So maybe this is a good time to discontinue FLSCo and just have, like
GNOME, a couple of 'spokespeople' for FLP.
-d
We didn't have any election since Spring 2008 (Fedora 9), and I can
read "From time to time, at least once every 3 Fedora releases, the
entire membership of FLSCo will stand for re-election".
You've done lots of work, but there is more do to. There will always
be. If it's fine for you, that works.
Spending lots of time helping new translators and maintainers, I think
that I could help the FLP more by joining the FLSCo. This is more a
request than an application as what I am actually doing does not need
really need an official status (yeah translators, you could help us
all!). I am actually one of the Fedora Project maintainers at
transifex.net, but don't think that I should approve/cancel new team
creation for example. I also try not to do too much, as people start
referring to me for really specific questions, that IMHO only rely to
the FLSCo (like team creation, changing teams coordinator…)
What's your opinion? I am sure many translators don't even know that
we have a steering committee.
[
0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_Steering_Committee
--
Kévin Raymond
(shaiton)
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2
--
trans mailing list
trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
--
Dimitri Glezos
Founder & CEO, Transifex
Social Localization Crowdsourcing
https://www.transifex.com/