Hi Paul,
3 issues:
1. I'm missing the docs-common in git. Is it moved yet?
2. It seems some web pages are not updated to reflect the git repository
move.
3. Quick translation doc is out of date, to use git repo instead...
Do you want me write a bug report?
/Magnus.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Dimitris Glezos <dimitris(a)glezos.com>wrote:
2008/10/10 Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:30:48AM +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
>> 2008/10/10 Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com>:
>> > The following docs and branches now exist for Documentation:
>> >
>> > about-fedora: f8, f9, master
>> > homepage: f8, f9, master (may be deprecated)
>> > readme: f8, f9, master
>> > readme-burning-isos: f8, f9, master
>> > readme-live-image: f8, f9, master
>> > release-notes: f8, f9, master
>> > install-guide: f8, f9, master
>>
>> Cool. Which ones of these do we want added on Tx and stats?
>>
>> If we aren't planning on publishing updates of the older docs, then
>> maybe we shouldn't bother adding them at all. Relnotes' last stable
>> version *does* get updated with new translations (the past months some
>> people might have committed stuff to f9) and the updates get published
>> on docs.fpo. Does this happen with `readme` too? If not, and commits
>> there will never get published on f9, then we might as well just have
>> just 'master' enabled.
>
> I don't see a reason for any branch other than 'master' to be carried
> in Transifex.
All docs exist in Transifex with the 'master' branch.
-δ
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--
--
Fedora-trans-list mailing list
Fedora-trans-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-trans-list