Reindl Harald wrote:
> I still think we need at least 2 things to seriously consider
holding
> things up:
>
> 1. File a bug (if there is one already, can you give a reference?)
if i only knew what to write there, it don't work, it breaks my profile,
it's in fact broken for me - other users profiles or a empty profile
won't help me much
We need it documented formally, else we cannot consider blocking qt-5.6.x
indefinitely. Please file a bug.
> imo, qt-5.6 is the more important piece here, I suppose we could
> do it the way you suggest, but it would also mean resetting *all* of
> KF5 testing:
> * rebuild entire KF5 stack of packages against Qt 5.5.x instead
> * resubmit to bodhi
too late now - it should had happened in two steps from the very begin
instead throw *two major* updates at the same time in the mix
After our kde-sig meeting this morning, this is our tentative plan moving
forward. Sometime later this week (or weekend), dvratil will work on
rebuilding kf5-5.20 without dependencies on qt-5.6.x, so we can consider
pushing that to stable repos first.
The result will be that qt-5.6.x will stay in -testing awhile longer (as of
now, it's only been 8 days, so another ~week or so is probably not a bad
idea).
-- Rex