On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:40:33 -0300
"Gerald B. Cox" <gbcox(a)bzb.us> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:46 AM, Christian Dersch
<lupinix(a)mailbox.org>
wrote:
> I know many use Firefox and are also power users of this browser. My
> intention is to bring new users a well integrated experience of
> Plasma and for most users QupZilla will be fine.
>
I thought we had already crossed the rubicon on that - meaning that
specifically for a web browser, functionality and usability are part
of the equation also, and they can collectively outweigh the perceived
benefits of an integrated experience.
Firefox is in the process of a major revamp where they are going to
have a multi-process architecture and support Chrome extensions.
with what impacts on functionality and usability?
Chromium is currently under package review in Fedora. QupZilla does
not currently support Chrome extensions, and from their FAQ it's not
on their roadmap.
Maybe they will change their mind, maybe they won't. In any event, we
should probably wait to see the results of the above before
addressing this again.
--
Reporter to Mahatma Ghandi after his tour of east London
"What do you think of western civilization, Mr. Ghandi?"
Ghandi - "I think it would be an excellent idea!"