On Sunday 26 April 2009 18:19:48 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 05:32 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190476
>
> Want me to close this as INVALID? ;-)
>
> I don't see how the dependency is a bug at all, nor do I understand the
> point of absolutely wanting to remove a package just to remove it. Disk
> space is cheap.
Its a packaging error because the package is not required to make marble work. If digikam
it is not required it is not a dependency. An error In computer parlance is called a bug.
You're missing the point. I don't care about the disk space,
but I do
care about having to download a 30MB package that I'm never going to use
over a slow DSL line,
Slow DSL Line. What's you're throughput when downloading the packages?
not only on first installation but also on
subsequent updates. I'm sure people on dialup feel even more strongly
about this.
This is more than likely.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.