Am 16.09.2015 um 06:43 schrieb Robin Laing:
On 2015-09-15 14:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 15.09.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Rex Dieter:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 15.09.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Rex Dieter:
>>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> than why not just stay at KDE4 as long it is possible
>>
>> When depending on the the product of a meritocracy and you're not
>> contributing to it, then you may not be satisfied with the output. And
>> that's fine. I'm sorry Plasma5 doesn't satisfy you.
>>
>> *I* strongly feel plasma5 is good enough, and enjoy investing time in
>> making
>> it better every day. I would not enjoy spending much effort prolonging
>> kde4,
>> especially if that means losing time making plasma5 better
>
> well, the problem is that we (as users) spend so much of our life time
> by waiting for "making xyz better" - that works only well if things
> where not better in the past, but after some iterations of "waiting for
> things getting better" aka "waiting how the become mature as that what
> you had before" you just get tired
>
> you get with each iteration of "we throw away working things and now you
> user have to wait for a unknown number of years to get them mature
> again" more tired until you are at the point "why in the world do i
> waste my life for waiting things to get mature again and not just accept
> that the whole IT is broken, leave it at all and start a fast food
> restaurant"
>
I have to agree on this one.
But as society changes, other items change. Some from demand, others
from greed. Look at the changes in Windows with 7, 8 and 1
well, one of the reasons finally switch anything away from Windows and
consider Apple also as harmful was to *not* have that problems all the time