On Sunday 09 August 2015 14:42:08 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Sunday 09 August 2015 09:43:45 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
>> You are not doing that anyway. KDE apps for Plasma 5 has not been
>> released as gold yet.
> Oh... 2 things...
> 1) Does anyone know when we should be expecing KDE 5 apps to be released
> as gold?
This is irrelevant. Plasma 4 applications are still KDE applications.
Migration is not a one-time flag day event.
> 2) Perhaps for a different debate, but perhaps it would be a good idea
> that this team does not release the next version of KDE / Plasma....
> whatever.... until all the pieces are in place.
Upstream explicitly decided against that with version 5. This is one of the
reasons why KF5, Plasma 5 and KDE Applications 15.mm are now separate
projects, and the reason why KDE Applications uses a yy.mm versioning
instead of 4.x or 5.x (to allow shipping applications of both types
In addition, even for the KDE 4 transition, which was supposed to be
coordinated the way you ask for, Fedora 9 included a kdelibs3 kdepim
(because 4.0 shipped without kdepim), and all the non-SC (now non-"KDE
Applications") kdelibs applications (Amarok, Krusader, etc.) were also still
kdelibs3. It took until F12 for us to be able to ship a spin without
kdelibs3 on it.
And do you remember all the complaints that materialized due to that.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.