On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and
> > > > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship.
> > >
> > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually
> > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too.
> > >
> > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once
> > > most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things
> > > a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you.
> >
> > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because
later
> > we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es
> > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we
> > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really
> > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :(
> >
> > Jaroslav
> >
> > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could
> > > even forgo the wait on reviews.
>
> I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored
> are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where
> there are a list of sponsores.
Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the
blocks field. Is that right?
Don't hurry :-)
Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and then
we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case you don't
need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you.
Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years
for it :D
Jaroslav
Eli