2010/7/4 Anne Wilson <cannewilson(a)googlemail.com>:
On Sunday 04 July 2010 13:19:13 Eike Hein wrote:
> Keeping the kdepim 4.5 beta out of kde-unstable would create a dange-
> rous precedent for the future by hampering what kde-unstable has up
> until now been used for, and thus limiting its usefulness for pre-
> release testing, and thus limiting testing.
I really can't see what the big deal is. All we're asking is that you make
sure it has a differentiated name - something like kde-pmTP would do it - so
that we don't get it as an update, but as a deliberate choice. What's wrong
with that request? And if you planned to do it anyway, why can't you say so
instead of mocking genuine concerns, as several people seem to think is the
way to reply
Why kdepimTP? If one don't want to test kdepim4.5 on a testmachine as
you stated some people have, why have it installed along with
kdepim4.4?
If one is afraid of kdepim4.5, what is so hard to use: yum
--exclude=kdepim update?
And if i'm willing to test, i want to test everything, including the
update from 4.4 to 4.5. That's part of testing.
This whole thread gets slowly ridiculous.
Test it or leave it.
--
LG Thomas
Dubium sapientiae initium