On 07/21/2009 07:40 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 06:31:44PM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
>
> Those are made by Red Hat employees as part of their regular job, so
> automatically fail under CLA. I think a bit of research (but I am not
> thrilled about doing it myself) of the RPMs from those release will
> reveal a GPL license. But IANAL and i don't work for Red Hat... (we can
> try a shortcut and ask spot)
I think you meant "fall" instead of "fail"! It did give me a chuckle
ROTFLMAO! the spell checker failed me. again!
though. But yes, these contributions to Fedora should fall under a
license that allows reuse, redistribution, and remixes, although I
suspect it's not Creative Commons.
Fair enough. But I think we may do something to change their license to
something usable (CC). If the relicense to CC for documentation/wiki is
possible, I expect it has to be possible for wallpapers. Should I ask
Spot about this?
--
nicu ::
http://nicubunu.ro ::
http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
photography:
http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/
my Fedora stuff:
http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/