Awesome. Thanks for giving the straight scoop here. :-)
I think Kalev Lember is one of the people who can fix this issue in
gnome-shell-extension-background-logo (using the dark variant of the
logo), so I'll cc him here and file a bug if not done already.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:49:55AM -0400, Zachary Snyder wrote:
Which, doesn't involve changing the extension. I was just playing
around
with it to see how it ticked.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Zachary Snyder <sadin(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> All that needs to be done is the default logo needs to be changed to its
> non-white variant for 26.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 05:51:42PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> > But won't changing the extension mess up the logotype for people using
>> > a different background? Or is that not really a concern?
>>
>> Unless it's changed, the extension only works with the default
>> background anyway.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com