Hi,
my list of things I located today in testing Nuancier
- is the folder where the submissions end up a concern for the admin?
- make * for mandatory fields
- add time field for when submission opens
- add "link to the original author" field
br gnokii
2013/12/20 S.Kemter <sirko.kemter(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
I worked a little bit on the design for the front page and I came up with
an idea:
http://img.susepaste.org/68449823
@Ryan & Mizmo do you have an idea how to put an slideshow on top of the
monitor?
br gnokii
2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:24:12PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote:
> > 2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr>
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:33:17PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote:
> > > 2013/12/18 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr>
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:40:44PM +0100, S.Kemter wrote:
> > > > First of all, I am still not convinced to get the
> pressure
> > back to
> > > have an
> > > > FAS account for an submission, we agreed for F19 that
> that
> > would be
> > > not
> > > > necessary but we had no way arround as you need one
> for the
> > wiki.
> > > So there
> > > > was only two who used the way to send me something and
> I
> > submitted
> > > it to
> > > > the wiki.
> > >
> > > Well you can still submit the file in the name of someone
> else.
> > >
> > > yeah but you are not the author, so how shall I notice that
> then?
> >
> > So we actually want to consider the case where:
> > * Joe takes a pictures and puts it on flicker under CC-BY-SA
> > * Jane sees the picture and likes it a lot
> > * Jane wants to submit it to nuancier
> > * Jane does not want to create a FAS account
> > * Jane asks Dave to upload the picture taken by Joe for her
> >
> > ??
> >
> > wowowow, just make it simple possible to submit without FAS account.
> For
> > F19 we had already the case that somebody submitted the work of
> somebody
> > else with another license. You always question me, why I have to
> > disqualify if its not correct licensed eg but in this case the author
> > changed the license after an conversation.
>
> I always asked when you spoke about 'ugly' submissions; brand, people,
> wrong
> license, stolen artwork are all fine reasons to reject a submission ;-)
>
> Anyway, back on the subject, would requiring a OpenID be ok?
> If so, I'll see what I can do to port nuancier to just require an OpenID.
> yahoo, google, FAS all provide OpenID login, but it makes things a little
> more
> tricky to store the submitter.
>
> > Then the titles becomes "Unicorn rocks pandas-by-mizmo"? And we
> display
> > it as
> > such?
> >
> > isnt there a difference between file name and name?
>
> There is on the one side the file name which indeed incoporate the
> submitter's
> name. On the other side there is the title (which used to be 'Name')
> which is
> just the title of the artwork, so can be set to anything.
>
> And when looking into this I obviously found a bug ^^.
>
> I was checking that filename and title are unique per election but in
> fact it's
> both (filename and title) that must be unique for an election.
> So as long as you and I provide different filename, we may use the same
> title.
> (Fixed and deployed)
>
> Ok, so beside the login question which I'm going to look into, is there
> anything
> else?
>
>
> Thanks for your feedbacks :)
>
> Pierre
>
--
make me rich, buy my Inkscape book
http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)