Since there is not working FAmSCo or FOSCo, and Council has not a dead
line to get FOSCo running on a short period of time. The only option is
to revitalize FAmSCo with new members, that will help not only
ambassadors but to get FOSCo to work.
my 2 cents.
De: Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com>
Reply-to: jzb(a)redhat.com, ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Para: Discussions with the Fedora Council and community <council-discus
Cc: ambassadors <ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Asunto: [Ambassadors] Re: Fedora Elections for FAmSCo
Fecha: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:32:54 -0500
On 11/19/2015 09:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo
> > strongly
> > suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes,
> > let's add to
> > the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have
> > to play an
> > *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with
> > the Council
> > or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks.
> > Does this sound more reasonable for you?
Sounds fantastic to me!
Does this mean you're onboard with FAmSCo elections with the proviso
that they should be actively working to make FOSCo happen?
Was anybody else -1 on FAmSCo elections?
ambassadors mailing list