Hi,

2015-11-20 0:32 GMT+07:00 Joe Brockmeier <jzb@redhat.com>:
On 11/19/2015 09:11 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > And that's the main reason why as an actual FAmSCo member I'm strongly
>> > suggesting to keep elections as planned by our rules. And yes, let's add to
>> > the main responsibilities of the new elected members, they have to play an
>> > *active* role in making FOSCo happen ASAP, working together with the Council
>> > or CommOps to sync out the necessary tasks.
>> > Does this sound more reasonable for you?
> Sounds fantastic to me!

Does this mean you're onboard with FAmSCo elections with the proviso
that they should be actively working to make FOSCo happen?


so I am not the only one who thinks that FAmSCo made the decision to find the idea of FOSCo good, and then just waited that somebody else does it.

Was anybody else -1 on FAmSCo elections?

Best,

jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS
jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/


--
ambassadors mailing list
ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/ambassadors@lists.fedoraproject.org



--
make me rich, buy my Inkscape book http://is.gd/yq5OD0 ;)