On 09/08/09 23:25, M Yakub Mizan wrote:
> I think that in general situations you can write directly, then
ask
> regionally and then edit the wiki boldly.
Before doing anything we should contact the Ambassador first.only
regional ambassador should do that.(any action)
That would be a given. David Nalley has found a possible template?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ambassadors-list/2009-August/msg00...
**as in my case, i used some other distribution than fedora as people
around used to say fedora is test ground for Redhat,all upcoming
Redhat features and updates are tested in fedora so it is not stable
one. that easily trap ppl as a name redhat is involved with fedora as
sponsor**
That is where as you then say, Fedora is a tesing ground for new ideas
for *all* of Linux, not just Redhat.
It is true Redhat will help defray some costs of the Fedora project,
but that does not mean Fedora is RedHat.
No more than the Olympic sponsor owns the Olympics.
*public feedback should always be considered strongly. *
we do develop best things ,we keep saying among ourselves and people
are quite ignorant .thats where the total project concept fall
down.(sounds bad and sad)
+1
Some useful thoughts have already been gathered for FamSco meetings.