On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:16:38AM +0100, Robert Scheck wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Robert Mayr wrote:
> As you can realise, this is has been a very unique situation. I don't
> recall having dealt with something similar in the past.
well, given an essential mistake happened during the election process
(a non-ambassador got elected for FAmSCo), it would make sense from my
point of view to have simply a complete reelection of FAmSCo.
Given, that nobody (minus two or three) is really comfortable with the
situation, a full re-election would be the cleanest way to escape it.
It would also be the fairest way for all candidates.
Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>