mailga added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@mattdm
Maybe we need a second tier — something like Ambassador Active
Contact? No one would be obligated to have this label, but those who choose it would
commit to making a best effort to meet certain standards (show up at meetings, respond to
email in a few days, etc.)
Don't we have them yet? I think mentors (they're ambassadors as well) are fully
qualified people and are also available to sustain the Ambassadors.
If I remember correctly @kushal meant that people joining the Ambassadors group should be
active elsewhere in the technical area. In this case (I know it is not a huge loss) I
never could join the group.
When @rhea and @robyduck say (in two different manners) that volounteer don't have to
be forced of doing, they're right, but in the other hand I still think that the
Ambassadors are our business card, so I don't like when someone external is saying
something like "I tried to reach someone in the Project and no one replied me":
this means that we have some holes somewhere.
Well maybe a more general mail "ambassadors(a)fp.o" could be a slight solution,
some people could have access to this mail and address the answers to the right person.
Thanks
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/438