On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jukka Palander <jukka(a)devspain.com> wrote:
This is quite upside-down method.
How can they judge anything if we haven't prepared the issue for them?
Or do we just trust them to judge anything without discussing first?
Why do you not trust them? Have they ever done anything in this area
that suggests we should not trust them?
Normally board orders something to be done and "lower" team
members do
the work and then board accepts results.
This is most definitely *not* how the Board normally works with the
rest of the community.
John