On 09/08/09 00:02, Joerg Simon wrote:
On Saturday 08 August 2009 23:38:30 Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
> Stop being so melodramatic
Oh that is personal ;)
On that I apologise, I got angry.
> It is not about denouncing,
> it is about transparency and accountability.
on what?
We have transparency and accountability troughout the mentoring and the
membership process and have guideline for Eventreports and material requests,
reimbursement guidelines ...
Everything else what is not in a workflow or report is stated in our Code of
Conduct:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct ...
Fedora Ambassador Conduct
Read our guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityConduct
Where is the bit not to ignore the public
--snip--
A example how this is done as a peer can be seen here:
http://tinyurl.com/mc2cmn
and at this time i was the one who was angry, got personal and i was far away
from being a FAmSCo Member - but FAmSCo was not needed to solve the "problem"
Where is the link to this on the Ambassador page?
> I hope treating the end-user\potential contributor as nothing.
> Is not part of this. Customer Service 101.
> Please do not play Ostrich, and bury your Head of this.
sorry i do not understand that
The problem still exists,
public being ignored,
we carry on.
>> FAmSCo is just an enabler not the inquisition.
> FamSco is there to steer and give advice, not live in Mount Olympus.
If you cannot engage in dialogue, what then?
as in my reply to David
--snip--
i am sorry if you see our work in this light - but just to be clear
with me in famsco there will be no "platform for reporting
bad behavior"
In that you are sincere.