On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:24 AM, David Nalley<david(a)gnsa.us> wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly. The problem is how do we identify - we
can't
exactly go door to door determining if people are indeed representing
Fedora well. How else can we realistically handle it?
One of the aspects I have noticed is that an "Ambassador" is a role
that is not really measured. For example, a packager who consistently
churns out "not so good" packages would be looked at with some bit of
wary approach by the reviewers. In a similar fashion, how do we
measure Ambassadors in terms of measurable goals ? Or, for that
matter, is it really possible to have measurable goals for Ambassadors
?
--
http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work