On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM, inode0 <inode0(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure about the election history of FAmSCo, maybe someone
who
has been around a while can explain how it used to work, but I'm
guessing range voting has been used in the past two FAmSCo elections.
Are ambassadors happy with this method of electing the ambassador
leadership?
Aside from the voting method, are there other things related to the
election or composition of FAmSCo that ambassadors think would improve
either the process or the constitution of the steering committee?
John
John,
I am not used to range voting, but I have nothing against that method.
I do have some suggestion regarding the election process. I was
commented about during the election process but I dropped the issue
because I felt that I was disrupting the process. I did wanted "to
change rules at the middle of the game." Now that elections are over I
suggest to amend rules before next run.
I suggest that the candidate statements should be closed on the same
date of volunteering for the seat. If some one does not want to write
a statement is okey to leave it blank.
Other suggestion is to stablish an order for the list of candidates. I
don't care if it is ordered by time of volunteering or if it is
alphabetically. But I find a bit rude that some one added himself at
the top, when every body was adding themselves at the bottom. I know
that there was not rule for that.
Those are just suggestion on my part.
Best regards
--
Neville
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Yn1v
Linux User # 473217
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Check:
http://www.clickmanagua.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -