On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:28:22AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 10.02.2010, 10:34 +0100 schrieb Matthias Kranz:
> I really don't know what you mean here. What bottlenecks are you
> referring to? And it sounds as if you extend the discussion to a wider
> field than before?
Not sure what Sascha means, but I think I pointed out some of the
bottlenecks in my first mail or in the townhall meeting.
But I forgot a group that is not supporting the spins: The board. I was
told that the board decided that there will be no spins media due to the
limited budget. Max on the other hand said will take the money for the
media directly from the EMEA ambassadors bugdet. This might be one of
the reasons why this request is stuck: There is a conflict between both
decisions. I wonder why the board never made their decision public and
why I had to learn about it from a Red Hat employee.
I am just catching up to this thread, and there are a lot of
assertions without specifics that are hard to respond to
constructively. But this one is very easy.
I can assure that at NO time did the Board make any recommendations or
decisions about budgets for spins media, otherwise it would be
reflected in our public minutes. I am not sure from whom you heard
this, but that statement is entirely inaccurate. I would invite that
person, whoever it is, to respond here, or to me privately, and I'd be
happy to talk about his or her misperception.
[...snip...]
> The discussion is going into a wrong direction.
+1! I want a constructive discussion instead of threatening people.
As do we all. Specifics would be helpful in helping to solve
problems.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com