Also, forgive me if some of you have read this already, but the FAmSCo
questionnaire is named
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F14_elections_questionnaire/FAmSCo_questio...
Shouldn't that be F15 and have the title Fedora 15 instead of 14?
Larry Cafiero
PS - I agree with Susmit: The separate page is not a big deal and, to be
honest, it makes it more clear. If it were up to me, FESCo, Board and FAmSCo
would have their own separate pages for questionnaires.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:30 AM, John T. Rose <rose(a)iastate.edu> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:26 AM, susmit shannigrahi
<thinklinux.ssh(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F14_elections_questionnaire/FAmSCo_questio...
>>
>> Don't you think a section within the questionnaire would have fit? Is
>> there a real need of splitting the ambassadors questions (might give
>> others the feeling that FAmSCo is something special)?
>
>
> I made a separate page because I didn't want to make the original page
> extremely wrong.
> This is not a big deal. We can just embed the page into the existing one.
>
> The more important thing is to have more questions.
Historically questions specific to one of the groups were tagged as
for fesco/famsco/board candidates on the common page for whatever that
is worth. Collecting and adding new questions on the day the questions
are due to be returned seems a bit late in the day to me.
John
--
ambassadors mailing list
ambassadors(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ambassadors