On 07/05/2016 07:49 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> From 8b877579f3d1a9bbfa728a6e78ff829d936efbb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= <pbrezina(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:23:57 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] sssctl: print a message when managing sssd
Shouldn't this be specific to the service manager used? systemctl is
quiet so this does add additional verbosity, but init scripts printed
the starting/stopping message as well, so we would print them twice.
In general, I'm more in favor of tools being silent unless something
goes bad.
I think we should print something when we are doing more operations such
as in remove-cache we are stopping and starting SSSD so I think it may
be nice to tell administrator that we have actually stopped sssd but
that we were unable to start it. But if you think we should stay silence
and just print an error feel free to ignore this patch or tell me if I
should make it systemd specific message.