On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
> <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
> wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
> Fedora 17 rawhide.
>
>
>
> Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
> to be pushed to
> updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
> turn up in the
> updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
>
> Please test them and give them karma at
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
>
> Ok, I will do it in the next days.
>
>
>
> I hope to be of help in reporting this.
> By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
>
> * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in
ldap
> * Not built by default
> * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
>
> So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
> sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
>
> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
> (0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
> (0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
> [ldap].
That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
features enabled for testing.
Not exactly. The back end will still try to load sudo/autofs/ssh but the
providers does not support it and the responders are not built (without
proper configure flag).