Dne 7.2.2012 14:03, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
>> <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
>> > Hi again,
>> > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
>> > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
>> Fedora 17 rawhide.
>> Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
>> to be pushed to
>> updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
>> turn up in the
>> updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
>> Please test them and give them karma at
>> Ok, I will do it in the next days.
>> I hope to be of help in reporting this.
>> By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
>> * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules
>> * Not built by default
>> * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
>> So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
>> sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
>> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
>> (0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
>> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
>> (0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
> That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
> However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
> features enabled for testing.
Not exactly. The back end will still try to load sudo/autofs/ssh but the
providers does not support it and the responders are not built (without
proper configure flag).
Thanks for the clarification. Either way, as I said: the Fedora packages
will build with --enable-all-experimental-features.