On 08/27/2014 10:09 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
warning reported by coverity
patch is attached
As I understand the code there is no way that 0 could be passed as
second argument to the realloc call, right? Because that would lead to
freeing same memory twice.
Would it be more defensive approach to test for zero argument
explicitly? What do you think Lukas?
sssd-devel mailing list