On 08/27/2014 10:09 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,

warning reported by coverity

patch is attached

LS
As I understand the code there is no way that 0 could be passed as second argument to the realloc call, right? Because that would lead to freeing same memory twice.

Would it be more defensive approach to test for zero argument explicitly? What do you think Lukas?

Thanks!


_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel