-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/04/2010 07:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 09/29/2010 06:40 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 04:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>>> Supported providers are mentioned in Description section, because there
>>> was already partial description present. Another possibility was to
>>> comment it as configuration option (e.g. create access_provider=ldap
>>> record there). I like this way more, but I'm not sure whether it is
>>> descriptive enough.
>> I don't really like that we're explicitly mentioning that there is no
>> access provider for Kerberos (since we have
open to create one). Can you
>> change it to be just a positive list of the providers it currently
>> supports? (auth and chpass).
>> Also, you should mention the chpass providers for both IPA and LDAP as
> Updated patch is in attachment.
Pushed to master.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----