-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/13/2010 04:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Supported providers are mentioned in Description section, because
already partial description present. Another possibility was to comment it as
configuration option (e.g. create access_provider=ldap record there). I like
this way more, but I'm not sure whether it is descriptive enough.
I don't really like that we're explicitly mentioning that there is no
access provider for Kerberos (since we have
open to create one). Can you
change it to be just a positive list of the providers it currently
supports? (auth and chpass).
Also, you should mention the chpass providers for both IPA and LDAP as well.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----