On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
<marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> Hi again,
> What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17
rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
I hope to be of help in reporting this.
By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
* '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in
ldap
* Not built by default
* Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options] (0x0400):
Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init] (0x4000):
SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider [ldap].
This is harmless, the SSSD is just telling that the back end module
contains sudo support[1]. Unless you actually configure the sudo provider
and the sudo client binary, nothing is using it.
[1] In more technical terms, that the shared library contains the symbol
"ssm_ldap_sudo_init" which can be loaded with dlsym()