jsimon added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@bex
I think we can make both work. I'd prefer to determine what is best for the project
and then adapt from that instead of setting an arbitrary lesser position and then
adapting. I don't see switching CC holders as a problem. This is partly because all
of the CC holders (5 of us) back each other up.
"best for the project" might be a good approach, but if we know upfront that the
reality will not keep up with our wishes, we should include that in the
discussion/decission - and we know that things work slow on some instance around this
topic ;)
I have/had the role as cc holder for over 7 years and also drafted the initial processes
for all the reimbursements together with Max 8 years ago. Personally i think that a
mandatory change after 2 years can reduce the potential of nepotism that comes with having
the same role over years.
On the other hand there is no denial that it takes a while for the bureaucratic act and
getting a regular routine.
The community cards given out at the moment are valid for 3 years ... at least my always
were - if you want to change this to a shorter range of two years with terminating the
account in favour of another person, please consider this in the future card holder
agreements.
Not being a Red Hatter myself, i had to go through several compliance instances at Red Hat
- legal, finance etc. - this took around 4-6 months, so please consider that this effort
would come up more often with every new holder. I also have the impression that it may
even will take longer in the future. Reason, while the last card change worked seamlessly
for me, i still have not heared back what happened with my card expiration - communication
and transparency is not optimal in this regards.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/434