On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:09:34PM -0400, Ben Williams wrote:
Looks like the page is coming along fine
IMHO yes we can mention rpmfusion but make sure you give the spill on
why things like codecs etc are not in fedora, if in doubt send them to
fedorasolved.org
The wiki is official Fedora Project documentation where we can't point
to RPMFusion in the context of codecs. We can explain why we don't
have codecs as a separate issue. We can include RPMFusion in a list
of third party repositories. But to link those two concepts together
walks the line of contributory infringement too closely, which is
impermissible. That's why we don't already do it on the [[Forbidden
items]] page.
I would strongly suggest a legal review of the FAQ once it's
completed. You can email the legal list at legal(a)lists.fp.o and I'm
certain Spot will be glad to lend a hand.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies:
http://opensource.com