On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Francesco Ugolini francesco@ephisia.org wrote: <snip>
If you take a look at Privacy policy (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/PrivacyPolicy), this is the possible usage of personal informations:
| Fedora uses the personal information you provide to: | | * create and maintain your accounts; | * answer your questions; | * send you information; | * for research activities, including the production of statistical reports (such aggregated information is not used to contact the subjects of the report); | * send you surveys.
I'm not a lawyer, but I could assume that if something is not present in the list, couldn't be done without the consent of the user.
So having a only, public space with people information (without asking people to do this volunteer) isn't simple as it could be.
I want to underline that what I'm saying isn't a professional advice, just some consideration on a legal paper. Suggestions are welcome.
Regards
Francesco Ugolini
Should this means that a more inclusive document has to be accepted by ambassadors Or maybe it points to the need to a "members only pages" that will allow ambassadors to have more info regarding other ambassadors, than what will be available to the public? I just thinking out loud here.
I think the most urgent topic is to shake the tree so the "dead" leaves fall. Better if this can became a process to avoid accumulation of non relevant data. Streamlining the info, may help to figure out if more complex actions are required.
Again, I am not against an ambassador that do a little activity or do a lot but does not show it on-line. I am in favour of having a better way to get in touch with each other when it is needed.
Should be that ambassadors get a yearly reminder to refresh their membership and failing to answer that automated email within a month move you to inactive status. Failing twice delete the account. It is just an idea. The time frame may need better thinking.
Best regards.