On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 03:37:03PM +0100, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote:
Read again what I said. If _RedHat_ has to hide some informations (which is totally understandable on a legal point of view for a private company), then the whole Fedora community should be kept unaware _even the ones working for RedHat_.
IMHO, that's the only way to preserve both:
- the secrecy needed by such an investigation
- the cohesion and transparency of the community
Ah, I see. You're under the impression that I or someone else in the Fedora community also knows what's going on in Red Hat's internal investigation. I can assure you that I, for one, don't. And that's been done, I believe, so the internal investigation and response isn't compromised.
Does this clarify the situation, then?
Totally.
And if that's the case, I do think it would have made a tremendous difference regarding the community reaction if it had been made totally clear from the very beginning.
I don't know, maybe you could have said it in your announces.
Or maybe someone from RedHat who is _not_ part of the Fedora community could have taken over the issue and communicated instead of you.
Anyway, now that you explained it, I feel totally dumb ^_^
Please, do clarify this outside of this list so that the FUD about the openness and transparency of the Fedora Community can stop (and yes, even if I've been part of the FUD, it's been hurting me).
Regards,
----------
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) French Fedora Ambassador
---------- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin