on (13/08/14 17:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >Thanks, that's a very helpful explanation. Then I propose we:
> > 1) revert the patch
> > 2) for downstream, add some documentation that certain openldap
> > servers are broken and if you use those, you need to disable
> > dereference
> >
> >Sounds like a plan?
> Agree.
Thanks for the explanation.
OK, can you send the revert so I can ack it and push it? The explanation
might do for a nice commit message.
Is description in attached patch clear or sufficient?
LS