On (03/12/14 21:44), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/03/2014 07:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (03/12/14 18:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:18:33AM -0500, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Nikolai Kondrashov"
<Nikolai.Kondrashov(a)redhat.com>
>>>>To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon"
<sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2014 4:00:14 PM
>>>>Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database
for libselinux
>>>>
>>>>On 12/03/2014 04:23 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>> From 7f041a011f44a8fb1c128095ad55c0669287209d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
>>>>>From: Lukas Slebodnik<lslebodn(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:34:43 +0100
>>>>>Subject: [PATCH 1/2] CI: Update valgrind suppresion database for
libselinux
>>>>>
>>>>>problem is already fixed in fedora >= 21
>>>>
>>>>Thanks, Lukas!
>>>>Do you have any information on what the problem was?
>>>>
>>>I'm sorry it isn't important information for me.
>>>Problem is fixed on fedora 21. And that's al what I need to know.
>>>
>>>LS
>>
>>Can you change the name as Nikolai requested so that we can push the
>>patch and unbreak CI?
>I do not see a reason why there should be prefix sssd-
>
>The problem is in libselinux and not in sssd.
Yes, but this way we'll also be able to see that it is *our* suppression and
not some other package suppression from /usr/lib64/valgrind.
valgrind will not use prefix "libselinux-"
LS