On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:45:27 +0100
Sumit Bose <sbose(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:01:18PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/07/2011 02:23 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 12:25:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Libldb performs non-indexed searches for ONELEVEL requests. We'll
> > use SUBTREE instead to reduce the performance hit substantially
> >
> >
> >> I agree with the patch, but please add a comment to avoid that
> >> LDB_SCOPE_ONELEVEL is accidentally reintroduced as an
> >> "optimization".
> >
>
> Comments added.
Thank you.
ACK
Apparently it is not a bug in ldb, but in owr own indexing
configuration.
Please hold on applying this patch.
I will send shortly a new one about indexes configuration.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York