-----Original Message-----
From: sssd-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of steve
Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 6:20 PM
To: sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 00:55 +0000, Greg.Lehmann(a)csiro.au wrote:
> It was defined in the first message. Same machine. All I am doing is
stopping sssd clearing cache dbs, restarting and doing some getents on
passwd and group entries.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sssd-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
> > bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Dmitri Pal
> > Sent: Wednesday, 4 December 2013 10:04 AM
> > To: sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion, maybe?
> >
> > On 12/03/2013 06:38 PM, Greg.Lehmann(a)csiro.au wrote:
> > > I'm using the standard SLES OS 1.9.4 packages. I may get time,
but
> > it's unlikely, to build newer versions.
> > >
> > > The nesting is shallow:
> > >
> > > Group1 contains group2, group3 group4, user1, user2, user3
> > > Group2 contains user4, user5, user6
> > > Group3 contains user7, user8, user9
> > > Group4 contains user10,user11,user12
> > >
> > > So what is happening is that sometimes, getent group1 is
returning
> > just user1,user2,user3 and other times it returns all 12 users.
> > Greg,
> >
> > Please define "sometimes"?
> > Same machine or different machines? I mean does it work from some
> > machines and does not from others or on the same machine you run at
> > different times and you get different results?
> > What is the state of the machine in terms of cache? Was it cleaned
in
> > between attempts?
> > Is the system online or offline when you observe the issue?
> >
> > Since it is AD and AD requires multiple round-trips to get nested
> > groups
> > I might be that in your case the follow up lookups for some reason
do
> > not always go through.
> >
> > Jakub, may be it times out and SSSD thinks that there are no sub
> > groups?
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Greg
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: sssd-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-
devel-
> > >> bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, 3 December 2013 7:24 PM
> > >> To: sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [SSSD] problem with AD nested group expansion,
maybe?
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 07:19:50AM +0000, Greg.Lehmann(a)csiro.au
> > wrote:
> > >>> I've noticed under 1.9.4 that starting with an empty cache,
doing a
> > >> getent group does not return all members of the group,
sometimes.
> > >>> The actual group in AD contains some users and some subgroups
of
> > >> users. Not nested deeply, but multiple subgroups...
> > >>> If I do a
> > >>> getent group group1
> > >>>
> > >>> when the cache is fresh it does not return all members. If I do
a
> > >> getent passwd on one of my accounts as a member of group1 and
then
> > >> follow that with a getent group group1 it will return all the
> > members
> > >> of the group. If I getent passwd account2 (also a member of
group1)
> > it
> > >> does not help getent group return all members.
> > >>> Any ideas?
> > >>>
Hi
We have similar (nothing deep) nesting and had similar issues on
openSUSE with 1.9.5. It seems to be fixed on 1.11.x. It's a real pain
to
build and install but you could do us all a big favour by putting
pressure on SUSE to get up to date with sssd by informing them of your
problems with the existing version and success with a 1.11 version.
They'll listen more to an sles user than us!
On a side note, I'm surprised that it _sometimes_ works. Are you sure
you don't have nscd active?
Sorry this is not exactly what you want to hear but I predict that if
you can find the time for the build, it would resolve the nesting.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Tell you what: You get RHEL to include it and I'll push SUSE about SLES. I mean 6.5
just came out and they did not increase the version by even a minor step over 6.4! There
may be more chance of a change with SLES 12 although it is likely based on opensuse and as
you say that has not gotten there yet.
I think my point here is that Enterprise versions of Linux are hard to get changed.
Cheers,
Greg