-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2015 04:48 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (28/10/15 09:03), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 10/27/2015 05:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (27/10/15 09:48), Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> We get an error message if we start up SSSD and the debug
>>> log does not yet exist.
>>
>>> From 53592734f73c50029fa573b9bc070437304ea489 Mon Sep 17
>>> 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:39:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] DEBUG:
>>> Don't error on chown of nonexistent file
>>>
>>> We get an error message if we start up SSSD and the debug
>>> log does not yet exist. --- src/util/debug.c | 9 ++++++--- 1
>>> file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/util/debug.c b/src/util/debug.c index
>>> a8eea32740155ec3daf6be71ef9a8af6592f74a9..729d9f99d35c7208950a9a1af1f
>
>>>
df3942b23a147
>>> 100644 --- a/src/util/debug.c +++ b/src/util/debug.c @@
>>> -331,13 +331,16 @@ int chown_debug_file(const char
>>> *filename,
>>>
>>> ret = chown(logpath, uid, gid); free(logpath); if (ret != 0)
>>> { ret = errno; - DEBUG(SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE,
>>> "chown failed for [%s]: [%d]\n", - log_file,
>>> ret); - return ret; + if (ret != ENOENT) { +
>>> /* Don't write an error message for a nonexistent file */ +
>>> DEBUG(SSSDBG_FATAL_FAILURE, "chown failed for [%s]: [%d]\n",
>>> + log_file, ret); + return ret; +
>>> }
>> Patch make sense, But I cannot see an error message even with
>> empty directory /var/log/sssd. Do you have an idea why?
>>
>
> Start the sssd in interactive mode instead of sending to files
> and it will become clear :)
>
I'm sorry but it is not clear :-)
[root@host ~]# rm -f /var/log/sssd/* /var/lib/sss/{db,mc}/*
[root@host ~]# sssd -i -d 3 (Wed Oct 28 21:43:57 2015)
[sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [sysdb_idmap_get_mappings] (0x0080): Could
not locate ID mappings: [No such file or directory] (Wed Oct 28
21:43:57 2015) [sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [be_process_init] (0x0080):
No SUDO module provided for [
redhat.com] !! (Wed Oct 28 21:43:57
2015) [sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [be_process_init] (0x0020): No selinux
module provided for [
redhat.com] !! (Wed Oct 28 21:43:57 2015)
[sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [be_process_init] (0x0020): No host info
module provided for [
redhat.com] !! (Wed Oct 28 21:43:57 2015)
[sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [be_process_init] (0x0020): Subdomains are
not supported for [
redhat.com] !! (Wed Oct 28 21:44:27 2015)
[sssd[be[redhat.com]]] [be_run_online_cb] (0x0080): Going online.
Running callbacks.
I think it was fixed in ticket or did I miss something?
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2493
It's entirely possible; I was comparing against the latest Fedora
release and I missed that patch going in. Feel free to drop this.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlYyGc0ACgkQeiVVYja6o6ObkACePb/EfAA/heF7+VLMALdq05Mt
pE8An1+QkoT8oNfR2OQdacTlb5kwFLl6
=xcV8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----