On (29/07/16 13:44), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:07:56PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >Others who? :-)
> non developers (The person who requested this change; I assume this
> change was not requested by developers)
It was (and btw I agree with the change, consistent naming is important
as I wish I raised this concern when I reviewed the patches in the first
place..)
I was expecting an answer for keeping backward compatibility with
unused feature.
The review of changes in design document will be just a blessing
the intention from requestor.
LS