On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:50:29PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:52:04AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Can we not use the ldap_ prefix since this option is supposed to be present
> also in responder?
Well, I don't think it should be used in the responder. I think the
responder should just request whatever it needs to and let storing the
data to cache for the Data Provider.
What we can do is to return a DP error to make it clear that DP hit a
sizelimit and the result might be incorrect, but that's it.
Also, different servers in different domains might need this option set
differently, so I don't think this is a responder-side option at all.
Why do you think there should be one on the responder side? Maybe we
could add a matching responder option, but I'm not sure it's needed.
The responder is normally quite fast and able to act upon any cache