On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 15:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 13:10 +0200, Pavel Zůna wrote:
>
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SigChld
That's not exactly what I was looking for (among other things, it
doesn't account for removal of children that are no longer alive). I
added an alternate proposal to that page. Please read it and see if it
makes sense to you.
Also, using the online/offline callbacks as an example wasn't a good
place to work from. Those are designed the way they are because they can
be triggered from multiple places, not just the SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2
debugging signals.
Isn't a hash table for children a bit overkill ? How many children do
you plan to have ?
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York