On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 11:11 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 07:20:36AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > since we are creating a plugin interface, we should use custom
> > > > > data
> > > > > type in _recv instead of struct ares_srv_reply.
> > > >
> > > > makes sense. Then I would suggest that a list ordered according
> > > > to RFC
> > > > 2782 of hostname, port pairs is returned, where the elements then
> > > > can be
> > > > fed directly to create_fo_server(). Do you agree?
> > >
> > > For SRV records the RFC 2782 makes sense for sure, but is it also
> > > applicable
> > > to the AD site discovery?
> >
> > yes, since it is alse a SRV request. But there might be other
> > environments where this is different, that's why I think it make
> > sense
> > to let the plugin return the list in a appropriate order.
>
> Maybe we should use an opaque structure private to the plugin
> and then provide getters and setters ?
Sorry, I cannot follow, getters and setters for what?
For the results.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York