On (25/06/14 22:04), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 06/25/2014 09:54 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (25/06/14 21:45), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>Please find attached v2 of the CI patch.
>>
>>This version pulls Red Hat distro dependencies from contrib/sssd.spec.in.
>>I was able to find a way to do it without resorting to unsafe sudo rules.
>>
>>As before, I would still prefer to move clang/lcov to the moderate set and
>>distcheck/mock to the full set. Is there anyone for/against that?
>>
>>Examples of full test set output on CI machines:
>>
>>Debian Testing
http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_deb...
>>Fedora 20
http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_fed...
>>RHEL6
http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhe...
>>RHEL7
http://sssd-ci.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com:8080/job/new_private_master_rhe...
>>
>Do not paste private link to upstream mailing list. It is not the fist time.
>It is not open source way.
I agree, posting links to internal resources is not very nice (although more
useful than not) and will remove them. However, I would say that berating
fellow engineers hurts our open source way more.
If you mean me I will like to see
citation, because I have not offended anyone.
I've just criticised wrong approach. Firstly in constructive way, secondly
strinct NACK.
LS