On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:51:06PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:51:46AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
>> On 09/10/2013 04:34 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:47:17AM +0200, Ondrej Kos wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Attached patch resolves the issue
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1187
>>>
>>> I think the man page looks good now. I would like to ACK and push the
>>> patch as-is, but I'd like to have kind of a last call if any other
>>> developer would prefer to move the options to an "Advanced"
section.
>>>
>>> The remaining options that are shared with the krb5 provider have different
>>> defaults or meaning than in the traditional krb5 provider.
>>
>> I don't think there is any reason to use those options, unless a
>> very specific needs. So feel free to remove them.
>>
>
> OK. I will push this patch as soon as we branch off sssd-1-11 from
> master (all these changes are targeted for 1.12)
>
>> But this made me thinking, maybe we can move all attribute options
>> to a separate manual page. Those options are not normally needed
>> (especially since we added ad provider), but shadows configuration
>> options, since user looking for a specific option has to go through
>> all attribute options as well. And there is *a lot* of them.
>
> I was thinking about this as well, but actually for pure LDAP provider,
> the options are often useful, there is still a lot of people around who
> use LDAP provide with AD and map attributes to SFU aliases. So I think
> we should move the options to their own section in the sssd-ldap man
> page so that the options that fine-tune the behaviour are more visible
> and nicely grouped.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2088
OK. I'm fine with that.