-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 07:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/19/2010 06:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 04:44 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've found a misleading statement in the man page, this patch should
>> fix it.
> Nack. GSSAPI does not guarantee that Kerberos is available for user
> logins. It's strongly indicative, but it WOULD be possible for an
> environment to be set up to use GSSAPI instead of certificates for
> maintaining client->LDAP connectivity, without using Kerberos for auth.
> Yes, it would make more SENSE to use Kerberos for auth in this
> situation, but it's not mandatory.
> Also, I was under the impression that we DID support authentication over
> GSSAPI. If that's not true, please file an enhancement bug.
After discussion with Sumit on IRC, I withdraw my nack. This is
something we can add later if we actually get a request for it.
Ack to the manpage change.
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkzmx6wACgkQeiVVYja6o6MBXACfRDf+zfWlIhAxeDI/5oTxt3z/
57oAnA5P+TfqVXv5FTuwup6Hdj6Busmu
=l2Ko
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----